This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I can't explain why it passes for you. (x86_64 lp64 mode, right?) I just redid the tests and I can trigger the failure with either the noinline patch or -fpic. I can also trigger it in the unpatched case by adding -O0 instead of -fpic which avoids the inline as well.
Can anyone else reproduce it?
Ok, if I rebuild libgcc I can reproduce the fail. Care to open a PR for this?
Index: soft-fp.h =================================================================== --- soft-fp.h (revision 132367) +++ soft-fp.h (working copy) @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ typedef USItype UHWtype; #endif
-#ifndef CMPtype +#ifdef _LIBC #define CMPtype int #endif
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |