This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] proper dataflow block visitation order

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: "Seongbae Park (???, ???)" <seongbae dot park at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 14:44:22 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proper dataflow block visitation order
References: <ab3a61990802081707p22da0980rda3d184f66963267@mail.gmail.com>

Bootstrapped on i686 with c/c++ and no regression.
While this is not exactly a regression,
I'd like to commit this to 4.3 -

The patch may be okay for 4.3 with the changes Steven suggested. However, I'd like to see also an assembly language output comparison for some .i files (e.g. cc1 or SPEC).

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] proper dataflow block visitation order
  - From: Kenneth Zadeck

References:
- [PATCH] proper dataflow block visitation order
  - From: Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]