This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Richard Guenther wrote:This makes the fix for PR33887 safer in that __java_boolean is treated the same as C++ bool. This is especially important for its special semantics on increment.
Bootstrap and testing on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, ok if that passes?
Thanks, Richard.
2008-01-21 Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR c++/33887 * decl.c (record_builtin_java_type): Make __java_boolean a variant of bool. * typeck.c (structural_comptypes): Move TYPE_FOR_JAVA check after TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT check.
This one causes these libjava regressions on ppc-darwin:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-01/msg01414.html
Unfortunately it took me some time to discover since bootstrap time is growing.... I can only do a bootstrap every other day. The cycle increased to 24h :(
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |