This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 34758

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Gcc Patch List <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:48:43 +0100
Subject: Re: [C++ Patch] PR 34758
References: <478FD2ED.4060906@suse.de> <47939FA4.7050106@codesourcery.com> <4793B95D.2080603@suse.de> <4793BADB.7090008@codesourcery.com>

Hi,
> Obviously, if the error message doesn't make sense to someone as
> knowledgeable about C++ as you, then we should do better.  I just don't
> see how the change suggested actually improves the situation.
>   
;) Thanks, I think that now I begin see... I got confused because an
error message about line 2 (the constructor) actually only prints text
referring to line 3 (and there, at line 3, *everything* has been
parsed)... Seems just another example of the long standing issue about
using carets in the error messages...

Paolo.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 34758
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 34758
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- [C++ Patch] PR 34758
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 34758
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 34758
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 34758
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]