Re: [PING^4] Fix -fvar-tracking problems on big-endian systems

[Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at nildram dot co dot uk>]

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 12:18:19PM +0000, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> I wanted to push back a little because I think the benefit is higher
>>> than you made it sound.  If you say no again, I'll accept it.
>> 
>> I agree with Richard here that the benefit of this is quite big
>> and it would be good to have this in 4.3.
>
> Eric, would you be willing to review this from a technical perspective,
> imagining that it will go into 4.4?  Then, report back with whatever
> issues you might find and let us know if you're still concerned about it
> going into 4.3.  If so, we can make a final 4.3/4.4 decision at that
> time, but at least we'll have the patch reviewed for 4.4.

Thanks for the reply.  For the record, Eric reviewed (and approved
a revised version of) the patch after Jakub sent his message, but the
discussion went back to the original thread rather than this one.
Sorry for the confusion!

Richard