This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] darwin x86_64 libjava
- From: Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>
- To: Dominique Dhumieres <dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:59:20 -0500
- Subject: Re: [patch] darwin x86_64 libjava
- References: <20071210194616.ED5065BB6C@mailhost.lps.ens.fr>
Dominique,
The objc failures at -m64 are expected for darwin9 since
the objective c 2.0 changes haven't been added to FSF gcc
yet. However, this shouldn't be the case for libjava. Can
you post what the libjava log file shows for one of the
failed test cases like...
FAIL: linking PR9577
You might also scan your log and make sure all of the linkage
failures produce the same error message.
Jack
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:46:16PM +0100, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
> Jack,
>
> > Out of curiosity, how well does
> > x86_64-apple-darwin9 (and i686-apple-darwin9
> > at -m64) do on the libjava and libffi
> > testsuites?
>
> For i686-apple-darwin9 and -m64 the answer is
> very good for libffi and awfull for libjava:
>
> === libffi Summary for unix/-m64 ===
>
> # of expected passes 1116
> # of unsupported tests 8
>
> === libjava Summary for unix/-m64 ===
>
> # of expected passes 41
> # of unexpected failures 834
> # of expected failures 35
> # of untested testcases 1586
>
> The results are also quite bad for objc and obj-c++ at both
> -m32 and -m64. I have posted some results twice about a month
> ago, but nobody seemed to care.
>
> Dominique