This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Avoid warnings during bootstrap on arm-linux


On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, 12:38:57 +0100, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> Manfred Hollstein <manfred@die-hollsteins.de> wrote:
> >> 	* config/arm/arm.c (arm_size_return_regs): Make return type
> >> 	unsigned.
> > 
> > Dunno if there are some common rules, but shouldn't we use "unsigned int"
> > here instead of plain "unsigned"?
> 
> I dunno too and I have no opinion, though I've applied that patch
> already.  BTW, it looks there are many uses of plain unsigned in
> config/arm/arm.c and the other gcc C files.

I'd vote for not introducing more uses, but rather change all such
places into explicit uses of "unsigned <type>" whenever they get
touched.

> Regards,
> 	kaz

Cheers.

l8er
manfred


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]