This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: btest-gcc.sh patch ping and Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- To: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- Cc: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <rask at sygehus dot dk>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 17:39:03 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: btest-gcc.sh patch ping and Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
- References: <474C8FA4.2040603@codesourcery.com> <474C95BA.1060807@t-online.de> <474C96C1.7010208@codesourcery.com> <474C98AA.50105@t-online.de> <474C9A65.2060902@codesourcery.com> <474C9B33.8060503@t-online.de> <474C9CBD.2070708@codesourcery.com> <87fxyqdc45.fsf@firetop.home> <474D943C.4030106@codesourcery.com> <877ik0aerh.fsf@firetop.home> <20071130022132.GL17368@sygehus.dk> <20071203092630.N17510@dair.pair.com> <5B2201B7-4859-46E3-8994-FB1B1EF20A2A@geoffk.org>
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Geoff Keating wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2007, at 6:40 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> wrote:
> > 2 - btest-gcc.sh isn't updated to cover fortran.
> > Patch at <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg01710.html>. Ping!
>
> Rejected; I do not think this script needs to be configurable in this fashion.
But *I* do. As it doesn't affect the default functionality or
the integrity of the result (everything still listed in
build_log), and doesn't take away or add redundant
functionality, I don't really understand your rejection.
> If there's a log missing, and you think the underlying functionality is stable
> and well supported by GCC contributors on all platforms where it is enabled,
> propose a patch to add it.
The fortran tests are stable where it works, or so it seems.
Whether it works is port-specific (build issue on *-elf being
covered in this thread), and the patch above was a way to add
the functionality per-platform. It would also allow e.g.
tracking gas or ld results in a combined tree.
I just need a regtest-script I can point to, such that people
can see how I build and regtest and possibly repeat it. Your
btest-gcc.sh mostly fits, but not covering all gcc-related tests
that run by "make check" is really an issue. I guess I could
solve that by adding a variant of that script in contrib/ though
I do prefer improving the existing one.
brgds, H-P