This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c++/8171: Comparing pointer-to-member-functions of derived classes

From: "Ollie Wild" <aaw at google dot com>
To: "Mark Mitchell" <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "Volker Reichelt" <v dot reichelt at netcologne dot de>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:14:49 -0800
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c++/8171: Comparing pointer-to-member-functions of derived classes
References: <tkrat.9fc3afb2b754eb46@netcologne.de> <4737AD61.9020702@codesourcery.com> <65dd6fd50711300253n7194aaabqd98bb89bdce25a24@mail.gmail.com> <4750774A.2020501@codesourcery.com>

On Nov 30, 2007 12:49 PM, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> Ollie, why did you use
>
> +         if (TREE_TYPE (op0) != type)
>
> rather than:
>
>   if (!same_type_p (TREE_TYPE (op0)), type)

Only because I was duplicating the usage which occurs later in the
same function.  I'll switch to same_type_p and submit once I've
retested.

Ollie

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c++/8171: Comparing pointer-to-member-functions of derived classes
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c++/8171: Comparing pointer-to-member-functions of derived classes
  - From: Ollie Wild
- Re: [PATCH] Fix PR c++/8171: Comparing pointer-to-member-functions of derived classes
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]