This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PR33713: remove -fforce-addr

From: Paolo Bonzini <paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch>
To: Michael Meissner <michael dot meissner at amd dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 06:32:13 +0100
Subject: Re: PR33713: remove -fforce-addr
References: <20071129175051.GA12296@redhat.com> <20071130000233.GA19742@mmeissner-gold.amd.com>
Reply-to: bonzini at gnu dot org

I'm coming in late to this.  Given there were a few examples that were faster
with -fforce-addr

There was basically one -- equake from SPEC2000. I can try to look at it but I can't promise anything on the time.

I also would prefer a deprecated switch get a warning, rather than silently
accepting it.

This was the current practice, AFAICT.

Paolo

References:
- PR33713: remove -fforce-addr
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: PR33713: remove -fforce-addr
  - From: Michael Meissner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]