This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Put scope blocks on a diet


On Nov 29, 2007, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:

> Alexandre will presumably pick (1) as well, since, IIUC, he values
> highly getting the same code without and without -g.

For the record, for the time being, I'd pick (4): leave as is, which
appears to be the current consensus.  But I do have some ideas that
might enable us to recover memory savings without getting DECL_UIDs
out of sync.  I don't have a timeframe for implementing them, though.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member         http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]