This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

RE: PR cpp/33907 Empty macro definitions not considered equal

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
Cc: 'Manuel López-Ibáñez' <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>, 'GCC Patches' <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:03:46 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: RE: PR cpp/33907 Empty macro definitions not considered equal
References: <6c33472e0711280858w6a310f76w410f04a1631294d7@mail.gmail.com> <00c901c831e2$6e4e1500$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>

On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Dave Korn wrote:

> "The standard (6.10.3) mandates this diagnostic when there is a mismatch in

Please, no subclause numbers in comments without stating the standard 
version being referred to.  I think we have references to all of C89, C90 
and C99 in comments in different places (without disambiguation) at 
present.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- RE: PR cpp/33907 Empty macro definitions not considered equal
  - From: Dave Korn

References:
- PR cpp/33907 Empty macro definitions not considered equal
  - From: Manuel López-Ibáñez
- RE: PR cpp/33907 Empty macro definitions not considered equal
  - From: Dave Korn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]