This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix includes of sparseset.*

From: Peter Bergner <bergner at vnet dot ibm dot com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Cc: tromey at redhat dot com, Bernhard Fischer <rep dot dot dot nop at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:04:24 -0600
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix includes of sparseset.*
References: <20071127220158.GA17973@aon.at> <m3prxul0yb.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4aca3dc20711281027q4567ac47u4efe354770710c5c@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 13:27 -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> If the conflict is in the name of the functions, really, we should
> just prefix the sparseset functions with sparseset_ or something to
> avoid namespace issues.

All of the types and functions do start with sparseset_.  The problem
looks like it's due to a symbol defined in system.h or something it
includes getting defined differently if we've included config.h or
not.

I'm no expert here, so I'm ok with any solution that allows sparseset.c
to compile and people think is correct.

Peter

References:
- [PATCH] Fix includes of sparseset.*
  - From: Bernhard Fischer
- Re: [PATCH] Fix includes of sparseset.*
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [PATCH] Fix includes of sparseset.*
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]