This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Link tests after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
>> Yes, that makes sense to me. Bare metal systems are of course somewhat
>> different. What do you think about that?
>
> I think it's well established that at least some bare-metal systems
> default to not linking with any particular start-files (etc.).
Sorry, I meant to be asking: "for bare-metal, do you think we should
permit the library configure scripts to perform link tests (as we do for
GNU/Linux), or should we require that they perform no link tests?"
>> Do you understand how MIPS/Power works? I'd really like to know what
>> the difference is. It might be an easy difference to resolve, or there
>> might be something more fundamental, but before we do anything I'd like
>> to know why one works and the other doesn't.
Thanks for answering this. Bernd, I'd be interested in whether any of
that helps.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713