This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH RFC: Add -fmerge-debug-strings option
- From: "Manuel López-Ibáñez" <lopezibanez at gmail dot com>
- To: "Mark Mitchell" <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "Ian Lance Taylor" <iant at google dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
- Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 03:12:43 +0100
- Subject: Re: PATCH RFC: Add -fmerge-debug-strings option
- References: <m3bq9tlo2a.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <474785BC.1060305@codesourcery.com>
On 24/11/2007, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Do we have a convention about whether we document -ffoo or -fno-foo in
> the manual? (I could imagine documenting -fno-foo for options on by
> default, since -fno-foo is probably what users would want to know how to
> use.)
>
Yes, we document whatever is not on by default. But, it would be
better to include both forms in the index by using
@opindex -ffoo
@opindex -fno-foo
Cheers,
Manuel.