Re: [Patch, fortran] PR33541 - gfortran wrongly imports renamed-use-associated symbol unrenamed

[Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>]

Paul Richard Thomas wrote:

> I find this part of the standard to be quite obscure
> and much prefer the description of the DEC Fortran manual:
>
> << If more than one USE statement for a given module appears in a
> scoping unit, the following rules apply:
>
> If one USE statement does not have the ONLY option, all public
> entities in the module are accessible, and any rename- lists and
> only-lists are interpreted as a single, concatenated rename-list.
>
> If all the USE statements have ONLY options, all the only-lists are
> interpreted as a single, concatenated only-list. Only those entities
> named in one or more of the only-lists are accessible. >>

Well, then perhaps we (J3) should add that (or something similar) as a note.

Kind regards,

--
Toon Moene - e-mail: toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.indiv.nluug.nl/~toon/
GNU Fortran's path to Fortran 2003: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Fortran2003