Re: [C++, diagnostic] PR 33495

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu>]

Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> writes:

| Hi all, hi Gaby,
| 
| I'm trying to make progress on this PR, taking also into account Jakub'
| comment in the audit trail about the unbounded size of statements.
| Currently I have the below, which passes regtesting on x86_64-linux,
| makes sense to you?

If we had `diagnostics with carret', we would just point to the locus
of the error.  Currently, we don't.  Just printing the statement would
not be good either -- because the internal representation does not
always accurately reflect the source code.  So, yes you're is OK if
you changed

| +       pp_cxx_identifier (cxx_pp, "<expression>");


to

 +       pp_cxx_identifier (cxx_pp, "<statement>");

Thanks!

-- Gaby