This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] More performance fallout from the PR33870 fix

From: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: "Richard Guenther" <rguenther at suse dot de>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, dnovillo at google dot com
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:57:43 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] More performance fallout from the PR33870 fix
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710291718410.4221@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710291806160.4221@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710292245350.4221@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <200710292252.30833.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

On 10/29/07, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> wrote:
> > Diego asked me to apply this (thus, revert the fix for PR33870).  The
> > following is what I committed after bootstrapping and testing on
> > x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.  The testcase is XFAILed.
>
> Grumpf. :-)  So are you still interested in my numbers for the previous state?

Yes ;)  I also let our tester pick up the revision before the reversal.  (but it
doesn't measure bootstrap time, nor does it build java).

Richard.

References:
- [PATCH] More performance fallout from the PR33870 fix
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] More performance fallout from the PR33870 fix
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] More performance fallout from the PR33870 fix
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] More performance fallout from the PR33870 fix
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]