This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Operand Scan times

From: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
To: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>
Cc: Andrew Haley <aph-gcc at littlepinkcloud dot COM>, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <rask at sygehus dot dk>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:36:43 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Operand Scan times
References: <1128366775.3080.7.camel@pain> <20071019171348.GY25795@sygehus.dk> <4718EC7E.8020203@redhat.com> <18200.60763.949670.992171@zebedee.pink> <4718F0A7.6040803@redhat.com>

Hi,

On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Andrew MacLeod wrote:

> ah, That would be a pretty lame implementation, comparing the same 
> element is a clear waste of time :-)  Is it actually triggering 
> somewhere?

Yes, I also run into this issue of such qsort implementations on one of 
the free BSDs, IIRC.  It really happens in reality.

Ciao,
Michael.

References:
- Re: Operand Scan times
  - From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Operand Scan times
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: Operand Scan times
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: Operand Scan times
  - From: Andrew MacLeod

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]