This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR33745 - fix bound checking at run time (wrong code) and compile time (missing diagnostic)
- From: Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>
- To: Tobias Burnus <burnus at net-b dot de>
- Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org'" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:52:19 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR33745 - fix bound checking at run time (wrong code) and compile time (missing diagnostic)
- References: <4711007E.1010804@net-b.de>
Tobias Burnus wrote:
Build and regression tested on x86-64/Linux. OK for the trunk?
This is ok. Extra points if you use the brief "(0 < 1)" in the runtime
message as well. Except cluttering the screen and making the message
harder to read, I see no benefits in printing "0 is smaller than 1", as
is done currently.
Cheers,
- Tobi