This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix optimization regression in constant folder

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: ebotcazou at adacore dot com
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, iant at google dot com, richard dot guenther at gmail dot com
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 12:24:59 EDT
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix optimization regression in constant folder
References: <200709171539.26653.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <200709301522.01416.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <84fc9c000709300626k56568fa3g2a2a6f58f1bca726@mail.gmail.com> <200709301801.39718.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

> Yes, I think that we need to keep them specialized.  

I agree because they are both always known to be much better behaved than any
user type and one of the most critical types to optimize.  It will always
be the case that many more optimizations are both safe and important for
those types than for user types.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix optimization regression in constant folder
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- [PATCH] Fix optimization regression in constant folder
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Fix optimization regression in constant folder
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: [PATCH] Fix optimization regression in constant folder
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] Fix optimization regression in constant folder
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]