This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [incremental] Patch: FYI: delay gimplification + partial cgraph revert

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Diego Novillo" <dnovillo at google dot com>, "Gcc Patch List" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:09:01 -0600
Subject: Re: [incremental] Patch: FYI: delay gimplification + partial cgraph revert
References: <m3y7eqpekg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <b798aad50709291022g4c59ffc8r767956b649ce48c3@mail.gmail.com> <m3d4w1pf44.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <84fc9c000709291051l1bd771c0vca592745b764ace0@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> writes:

Richard> There were concerns about memory usage regressions (it's not clear
Richard> whether the un-gimplified or the gimplified variant takes more memory).

Thanks.  I made a note to look at this.

Tom

References:
- [incremental] Patch: FYI: delay gimplification + partial cgraph revert
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [incremental] Patch: FYI: delay gimplification + partial cgraph revert
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [incremental] Patch: FYI: delay gimplification + partial cgraph revert
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [incremental] Patch: FYI: delay gimplification + partial cgraph revert
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]