This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [incremental] Patch: FYI: delay gimplification + partial cgraph revert
On 9/29/07, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>>> "Diego" == Diego Novillo <dnovillo@google.com> writes:
>
> Diego> On 9/28/07, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> Though the current patch is flawed, I think this is a good direction
> >> for the compiler to go.
>
> Diego> I agree. Would you consider moving this into mainline when stage1
> Diego> opens again? Delaying gimplification on the C/C++ FEs is a Good
> Diego> Thing.
>
> Sure thing. Though perhaps Michael will beat me to it :-)
There were concerns about memory usage regressions (it's not clear
whether the un-gimplified or the gimplified variant takes more memory).
Richard.