This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [patch] Configure test failure - too many arguments
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Matthias Klose <doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:00:38 -0400
- Subject: Re: [patch] Configure test failure - too many arguments
- References: <46B092FD.6010701@valvers.com> <jeabtbxp1y.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20070801155056.GA27737@caradoc.them.org> <46B0B29B.3020608@valvers.com> <20070801163829.GA29936@caradoc.them.org> <46B0C652.2030903@valvers.com> <20070807173922.GB10594@caradoc.them.org> <orwsvv8f2g.fsf@oliva.athome.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <18138.59715.121810.164303@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <84fc9c000709210831y50374293qd88d858465b76c0@mail.gmail.com>
Richard Guenther wrote:
> On 9/2/07, Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> wrote:
>> Alexandre Oliva writes:
>>> On Aug 7, 2007, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 06:43:46PM +0100, Brian Sidebotham wrote:
>>>>> 2007-08-01 Brian Sidebotham <brian.sidebotham@gmail.com>
>>>>> * configure.ac (leb128): Modify sed statement to work with any binutils
>>>>> version string.
>>>>> * configure: Regenerate
>>>> This looks fine to me. Could someone approve it - Paolo, perhaps you?
>>> The patch is ok, thanks.
>> ok for the 4.2 and 4.1 branch as well? Finally we did end up with the
>> same patch as proposed (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg00846.html)
>
> Ping!
This is OK for the 4.2 branch, even before the 4.2.2 release.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713