This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: [4.1/4.2/4.3]: Gcc failed to detect Linux linker version
On 9/23/07, H.J. Lu <hjl@lucon.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 05:48:32PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > On 9/13/07, H.J. Lu <hjl@lucon.org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 12:09:44PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:45:11AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> > > > > Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > > > > H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > > > >> Linux linker version is reported as 2.18.50.0.2.20070912. configure
> > > > > >> failed to parse it. This patch fixes. Tested on Linux/x86-64. OK
> > > > > >> to install to 4.1/4.2/4.3?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ok for 4.1 and 4.3. For 4.2, ask Mark.
> > > > >
> > > > > OK.
> > > > >
> > > > > (But, can we please stop making the GNU/Linux linker version numbers
> > > > > ever weirder? We seem to have a patch like this rather often...)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I will see if I can come up with a better approach to parse linker
> > > > version.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > I have seen
> > >
> > > GNU ld version 2.17.50.0.6-5.fc6 20061020
> > > GNU ld version 2.17.50.0.12-4 20070128
> > > GNU ld version 2.15.92.0.2 20040927
> > > GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.18.50.20070913
> > > GNU ld (Linux/GNU Binutils) 2.18.50.0.1.20070906
> > >
> > > This patch can handle any GNU linker version starting with xx.xx.*
> >
> > It doesn't handle
> >
> > > ld --version
> > GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.17.50.20070726-12 (SUSE Linux)
> >
>
> Have you tried my patch? I got
>
> # ./check "GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.17.50.20070726-12 (SUSE Linux)"
> ld_ver: GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.17.50.20070726-12 (SUSE Linux)
> ld_vers: 2.17.50.20070726-12 (SUSE Linux)
> ld_date: 20070726
> ld_vers_major: 2
> ld_vers_minor: 17
> ld_vers_patch: 50
Yes, I tried your patch, but somehow it didn't work. Maybe an error
on my side though - I'll retry.
Thx,
Richard.
>
> H.J.
> ---
> -----
> #! /bin/sh
>
> ld_ver="$1"
> ld_vers=`echo $ld_ver | sed -n \
> -e 's,^.*[ ]\([0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9][0-9]*.*\)$,\1,p' \
> -e 's,^.*[ ]\([0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9][0-9]*\)[ ].*$,\1,p' \
> -e 's,^.*[ ]\([0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9][0-9]*\)[ ].*$,\1,p' \
> -e 's,^.*[ ]\([0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9][0-9]*\)[ ].*$,\1,p' \
> -e 's,^.*[ ]\([0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9][0-9]*\.[0-9][0-9]*\)[ -].*$,\1,p'`
> ld_date=`echo $ld_ver | sed -n 's,^.*\([2-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]\)[-]*\([01][0-9]\)[-]*\([0-3][0-9]\).*$,\1\2\3,p'`
> ld_vers_major=`expr "$ld_vers" : '\([0-9]*\)'`
> ld_vers_minor=`expr "$ld_vers" : '[0-9]*\.\([0-9]*\)'`
> ld_vers_patch=`expr "$ld_vers" : '[0-9]*\.[0-9]*\.\([0-9]*\)'`
> echo ld_ver: $ld_ver
> echo ld_vers: $ld_vers
> echo ld_date: $ld_date
> echo ld_vers_major: $ld_vers_major
> echo ld_vers_minor: $ld_vers_minor
> echo ld_vers_patch: $ld_vers_patch
>