This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Cost of inlining when the function has call to a target-specific builtin

From: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: "Pranav Bhandarkar" <pranav dot bhandarkar at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Andrew Pinski" <pinskia at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 17:28:07 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cost of inlining when the function has call to a target-specific builtin
References: <649555d50709160703x593bf9f3o5635ecb3fe8d38b9@mail.gmail.com> <649555d50709161216p6d9868et93c7a701d977283a@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000709161249y66416bafyefde3f2ea597b423@mail.gmail.com> <de8d50360709171359n64e2e72ar6e676b8f6e8494fb@mail.gmail.com> <649555d50709201431w3febc46ey866177fab45516bb@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000709201453x49095f6dl3b3d8026b66ff46e@mail.gmail.com> <649555d50709220545r5cc583d3ja1d1e4affec97b6a@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000709220607q21a7353fr84b6019bd7b1742e@mail.gmail.com> <649555d50709220724q616e2971of7af20a1c029178d@mail.gmail.com> <649555d50709230708o455147ffif1f3c825d18215bc@mail.gmail.com>

On 9/23/07, Pranav Bhandarkar <pranav.bhandarkar@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/22/07, Pranav Bhandarkar <pranav.bhandarkar@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > This is ok supposed you bootstrapped and regtested this change.
> > Yes, but on arm-none-eabi.
> > However, I dont know If it is a policy to bootstrap and regtest it on
> > x86 before checking a patch in. So I am doing that currently on x86
> > anyways.
> Bootstrapped and regtested on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
>
> I'll need someone to commit this for me though.

Do you have a copyright assignment on file with the FSF?  This change
probably qualifies as minor, but I suggest you get one if you don't have
one already.

Thanks,
Richard.

References:
- [PATCH] Cost of inlining when the function has call to a target-specific builtin
  - From: Pranav Bhandarkar
- Re: [PATCH] Cost of inlining when the function has call to a target-specific builtin
  - From: Pranav Bhandarkar
- Re: [PATCH] Cost of inlining when the function has call to a target-specific builtin
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] Cost of inlining when the function has call to a target-specific builtin
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [PATCH] Cost of inlining when the function has call to a target-specific builtin
  - From: Pranav Bhandarkar
- Re: [PATCH] Cost of inlining when the function has call to a target-specific builtin
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] Cost of inlining when the function has call to a target-specific builtin
  - From: Pranav Bhandarkar
- Re: [PATCH] Cost of inlining when the function has call to a target-specific builtin
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH] Cost of inlining when the function has call to a target-specific builtin
  - From: Pranav Bhandarkar
- Re: [PATCH] Cost of inlining when the function has call to a target-specific builtin
  - From: Pranav Bhandarkar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]