This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PING - Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR33106 - F95 does not allow public entries to private derived types

From: "François-Xavier Coudert" <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
To: "Tobias Burnus" <burnus at net-b dot de>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org" <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:40:32 +0100
Subject: Re: PING - Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR33106 - F95 does not allow public entries to private derived types
References: <46E84378.4080703@net-b.de> <46EE4D97.10009@net-b.de> <19c433eb0709170250t1e6dbfc4maca903aafe1fd034@mail.gmail.com> <46EE9B1A.8090604@net-b.de>

> Anyone around who wants to review the patch (for the accepts-invalid
> PR33106) "F95 does not allow public entries to private derived types"?

Also OK.

PS: what about your "intrinsic modules" doc patch? I was in favour of
it, and since noone else objected, I think it's safe to commit.

FX

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PING - Re: [Patch, Fortran] -- PR33231 [elemental subroutine checking]; PR33325 [document intrinsic modules]
  - From: Tobias Burnus

References:
- [Patch, Fortran] PR33106 - F95 reject public entries to private derived types
  - From: Tobias Burnus
- PING - Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR33106 - F95 does not allow public entries to private derived types
  - From: Tobias Burnus
- Re: PING - Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR33106 - F95 does not allow public entries to private derived types
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert
- Re: PING - Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR33106 - F95 does not allow public entries to private derived types
  - From: Tobias Burnus

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]