This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: SSE conversion optimization

From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, "Jagasia, Harsha" <harsha dot jagasia at amd dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "rajagopal, dwarak" <dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com>, hongjiu dot lu at intel dot com
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 02:31:37 +0200
Subject: Re: SSE conversion optimization
References: <20070908231754.GA4425@lucon.org> <D5B24B5251882048AD03DDFA431BB790012F03A0@SAUSEXMB3.amd.com> <20070909001305.GA4886@lucon.org> <20070909122531.GF30523@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <20070909174904.GD29031@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20070909235928.GA1473@lucon.org>

> On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 07:49:04PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Hi,
> > this is variant of patch I comitted.  It change only amdfam10 codegen so
> > far until we figure out what would be best setting for generic and
> > core2.
> > For AMDFAM10 it is also better to offload to memory operand of
> > DImode->SF/DFmode conversions I will try to do next. 
> > 
> 
> There are 2 typos. It should be cvtdq2ps, not cvtpq2ps.

Oops, my very favorite typo.
The patch is OK, thanks for noticing it!

Honza

References:
- Re: SSE conversion optimization
  - From: H.J. Lu
- RE: SSE conversion optimization
  - From: Jagasia, Harsha
- Re: SSE conversion optimization
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: SSE conversion optimization
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: SSE conversion optimization
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: SSE conversion optimization
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]