Re: [PATCH, Fortran] PROCEDURE declarations

[Tobias Schlüter <tobias dot schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de>]

Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Tobias Schlüter wrote:
> > There are two quite different kinds of PROCEDURE statements: the form
> > with parentheses (R445, R451 and R1211) and the one without (R1206).
> > The former is akin to a a data declaration statement, the latter to a
> > MODULE PROCEDURE statement.
>
> Agreed, except for R451 which differs from both:
>
> R451 specific-binding is PROCEDURE [ (interface-name) ]
>                          [ [ , binding-attr -list ] :: ]
>                          binding-name [ => procedure-name ]

Woops, indeed, thanks for pointing this out.

> But we can start worrying about this when we start implementing it.

Agreed.

> > I think that's fine.  I would like this message and the one from above
> > to use a similar message, but I'm convinced that you'll find a
> > pleasant color for this particular bikeshed.
> Given the grey, rainy day I suggest blue and yellow.

Hey it's not raining over here!  Even if it were, the argument fails as 
nobody would use their bike on a rainy day!  :)

> > That depends on what information one keeps in the parsing stage :-) 
> > But this change is definitely beyond the scope of your current patch,
> > and can be addressed whenever someone feels the urge (i.e. never :-).
> If this should be really fixed, I suggest to fill a PR - otherwise we
> will forget about it.

It's only important if somebody touches the code, so I don't think it 
warrants a PR.

Cheers,
- Tobi