This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH INSTALLED]: const typedefs part 19/N
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 8/27/07, Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> wrote:
>
> > I know most SSA and middle end maintainers agree here.
Was there some offline conspiracy I wasn't invited to? :-)
> Indeed. I strongly object to all the changes that introduced shadow
> 'const' names for all the API routines. This is too much.
You "strongly object"? I didn't realize it was such a big deal, but ok.
I'll stop adding shadow functions and iterators. I had more in the
pipeline, so I'm glad you guys spoke up and made your feelings about it
clear. I'm a bit worried about reverting existing stuff because of
dependencies though. Let me see what's involved.
--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu