This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH: back end initialization reorganization
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Sandra Loosemore <sandra at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Sandiford <richard at codesourcery dot com>, David Ung <davidu at mips dot com>, Nigel Stephens <nigel at mips dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 23:02:26 +0100
- Subject: Re: PATCH: back end initialization reorganization
- References: <46BCEA6F.1040709@codesourcery.com> <46C63F9C.2080801@codesourcery.com> <46C64526.2060401@codesourcery.com>
Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
>> I think this patch meets the requirements that Ian and others requested.
>> (I've put Ian in the CC: to get his reaction.)
>>
>> I guess I think it would be OK to put this patch in without getting
>> everything else working, just so that it's not a moving target, but
>> that's arguable, and I have an obvious bias. So, what I'm hoping is
>> that Ian will say that the patch is OK, and indicate whether he thinks
>> we should put it in now, or wait until you have (a) the cfun stuff, and
>> (b) the MIPS bits all ready to go as well.
>
> Either plan would be OK with me. Not having heard any comments one way
> or the other about the idea for "the cfun stuff", I'm planning to jump
> into trying to implement it, and I hope another week of hacking will be
> enough to get something working. That's assuming I don't run into some
> other intractable problem along the way!
Assuming that there are no objections within 72 hours, I think you
should go ahead and check in the bits that you have working thus far.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713