This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Wrong coverage attribution.


*ping*^3

Seongbae

On 8/8/07, Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培) <seongbae.park@gmail.com> wrote:
> *ping^2*
>
> FYI, this pending patch is holding my other approved patch:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00366.html
>
> Seongbae
>
> On 7/30/07, Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培) <seongbae.park@gmail.com> wrote:
> > *ping*
> >
> > On 7/26/07, Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培) <seongbae.park@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > > 2007-07-26  Seongbae Park  <seongbae.park@gmail.com>
> > >
> > >         * tree-eh.c (lower_try_finally_onedest): Reset the locus of moved goto.
> > >
> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > > 2007-07-26  Seongbae Park  <seongbae.park@gmail.com>
> > >
> > >         * lib/gcov.exp (verify-lines): Recognize - and # as possible count.
> > >         * g++.dg/gcov/gcov-4.C: New test.
> > >
> > >
> > > Attached patch fixes the problem shown in the testcase
> > > - this testcase fails in the current mainline
> > > because of GOTO moved to a different block during eh lowering.
> > >
> > > Bootstrap and regtest are in progress.
> > > If all tests look clean,
> > > ok for mainline and 4.2 branch ?
>


-- 
#pragma ident "Seongbae Park, compiler, http://seongbae.blogspot.com";

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]