This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Wrong coverage attribution.

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
To: "Seongbae Park (???, ???)" <seongbae dot park at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Janis Johnson <janis187 at us dot ibm dot com>, mark at codesourcery dot com
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 01:50:05 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Wrong coverage attribution.
References: <ab3a61990707261609m285359d7hebfd00e8247beda7@mail.gmail.com> <ab3a61990707301127q304f10b8m39b684c8435b79a1@mail.gmail.com>

Seongbae Park (???, ???) wrote:

*ping*

Attached patch fixes the problem shown in the testcase
- this testcase fails in the current mainline
because of GOTO moved to a different block during eh lowering.

Sorry, I thought I'd emailed you about this, but I find no record of that. Could you explain in more detail what the problem is and why your patch is correct?

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::         CodeSourcery
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Wrong coverage attribution.
  - From: Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)

References:
- [PATCH] Wrong coverage attribution.
  - From: Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
- Re: [PATCH] Wrong coverage attribution.
  - From: Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]