This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][RFC] Another approach to fixing "bad" inlining


> We ran into the same problem a few years ago with C functions casted to
> incompatible function types.  Inlining in this case led to ICEs in the RTL
> expander.  We "solved" the problem by generating an explicit trap in lieu
> of the bogus function call:

To clear any confusion, the "we" above is the FSF GCC developers and the code 
in an excerpt of c-typeck.c:build_function_call in the current sources.

-- 
Eric Botcazou


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]