This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: [PATCH] c-cppbuiltin.c bits for libstdc++/31518


On 02 July 2007 19:07, Paolo Carlini wrote:

> Andrew Pinski wrote:
> 
>> On 7/2/07, Paolo Carlini <pcarlini@suse.de> wrote:
>> 
>>>> I think it is wrong to have this as a macro defined by the compiler.
>>> 
>>> Why, exactly?
>> 
>> Because people would abuse it.  It is not like libstdc++ can't use an
>> env variable to see what the length is requested at runtime rather
>> than at compile time.  Since the errors are being emitted at runtime.
> 
> In fact, we are not using environment variables this way. One big
> problem I can see, is error checking: what happens if the user defines,
> say, _GLIBCXX_MESSAGE_LENGHT, to something which is not a number?


  Then demons will fly out of their nose and it's all their own fault.  We don't have to care about that.

    cheers,
      DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]