This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Ping.... Re: Patch ping, docs... [patch] explain possible conflicts with -dCHARS



I still don't think "clash" has any well-understood meaning in this context.



I started to put "conflict" but...


I think it would be better to say:

@opindex dM
When used in conjunction with @option{-E}, generate a list of
@samp{#define} directives for all the macros defined during the
execution of the preprocessor, including predefined macros....

...

If you use @option{-dM} without the @option{-E} option, @option{-dM} is
interpreted as a synonym for @option{-fdump-rtl-mach}. @xref (or one of
the other cross-referencing nodes){the node for -fdump-rtl-mach}.

this is probably better.


-eric


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]