This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Modulo-scheduling improvements. Patch 2 of 2.

From: Andrey Belevantsev <abel at ispras dot ru>
To: Ayal Zaks <ZAKS at il dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Andrey Belevantsev <andrey dot belevantsev at gmail dot com>, David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>, Dorit Nuzman <dorit at il dot ibm dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, Mircea Namolaru <NAMOLARU at il dot ibm dot com>, Zdenek Dvorak <rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, Vladimir Yanovsky <yanov at il dot ibm dot com>, vmakarov at toronto dot redhat dot com, Vladimir Yanovsky <volodyan at gmail dot com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:12:39 +0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Modulo-scheduling improvements. Patch 2 of 2.
References: <OF11CC8688.272B48D1-ONC2257301.002D2908-C2257301.002F6369@il.ibm.com>

Ayal Zaks wrote:

I suggest we'll send you a combined patch once prepared, as we cannot test
on ia64.

That's fine by me, I will test it.


BTW, is there a preference in your opinion regarding
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01506.html?

I'm not an spu expert, so I don't know is it important to schedule the decrement or not. If yes, then the current scheme should be fine, otherwise with a normal split maybe the second scheduler will tidy the decrement after SMS.

Andrey

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Modulo-scheduling improvements. Patch 2 of 2.
  - From: Mircea Namolaru
- Re: [PATCH] Modulo-scheduling improvements. Patch 2 of 2.
  - From: Ayal Zaks

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Modulo-scheduling improvements. Patch 2 of 2.
  - From: Ayal Zaks

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]