This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tuples] constructors and gs_cond
- From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at google dot com>
- To: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
- Cc: amacleod at redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 21:48:45 -0400
- Subject: Re: [tuples] constructors and gs_cond
- References: <20070621224902.GA12879@redhat.com>
On 6/21/07 6:49 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> @@ -493,10 +487,6 @@ gs_assign_unary_rhs (gimple gs)
> static inline void
> gs_assign_unary_set_rhs (gimple gs, tree rhs)
> {
> -#if defined ENABLE_CHECKING
> - enum gimple_statement_structure_enum gss = gss_for_assign (TREE_CODE (rhs));
> - gcc_assert (gss = GSS_ASSIGN_UNARY_REG || gss == GSS_ASSIGN_UNARY_MEM);
> -#endif
Why wouldn't this work? Likewise for the other asserts you removed. If
we call gss_for_assign, it should work, right?