This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][dataflow] Fix PR 32339, bad DF_REF_READ_WRITE marking

From: "Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)" <seongbae dot park at gmail dot com>
To: bonzini at gnu dot org
Cc: "gcc-patches >> GCC Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Kenneth Zadeck" <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>, "Ian Lance Taylor" <iant at google dot com>, "Berlin, Daniel" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 23:34:09 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH][dataflow] Fix PR 32339, bad DF_REF_READ_WRITE marking
References: <ab3a61990706142303ja99967dtcb872fd1f9f6c3a9@mail.gmail.com> <46722E22.3070604@lu.unisi.ch>

On 6/14/07, Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@lu.unisi.ch> wrote:

> Bootstrapped and regtested on ia64.
> OK fo mainline ?

OK.  Did you check if there are similar cases that, by inspection, could
be wrong?


Not before you asked :)
I just looked at it, but I see no similar problem at least within df_uses_record
and its families.
Committed as 125736.
Thanks!
--
#pragma ident "Seongbae Park, compiler, http://seongbae.blogspot.com";

References:
- [PATCH][dataflow] Fix PR 32339, bad DF_REF_READ_WRITE marking
  - From: Seongbae Park (박성배, 朴成培)
- Re: [PATCH][dataflow] Fix PR 32339, bad DF_REF_READ_WRITE marking
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]