This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Fix breakage
- From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 05:39:04 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix breakage
- References: <f4ra7b$1sd$1@sea.gmane.org>
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:53:18PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Sorry, I committed the wrong version of the patch.
>
> 2007-06-14 Paolo Bonzini <bonzini@gnu.org>
>
> * configure.ac: Fix earlier checkin.
> * configure: Regenerate.
>
> Index: configure.ac
> ===================================================================
> --- configure.ac (revision 125700)
> +++ configure.ac (working copy)
> @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ else
> ac_checking_flags=release
> fi])
> IFS="${IFS= }"; ac_save_IFS="$IFS"; IFS="$IFS,"
> -for check in release,$ac_checking_flags
> +for check in release $ac_checking_flags
> do
> case $check in
> # these set all the flags to specific states
I don't think it is right. Your patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-06/msg00940.html
doesn't say that we will enable release check unconditinally. I will
check in my patch to restore the old behavior.
H.J.
----
2007-06-14 H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
* configure.ac: Fix a typo in --enable-checking=.
* configure: Regenerated.
--- gcc/configure.ac.check 2007-06-14 05:12:44.000000000 -0700
+++ gcc/configure.ac 2007-06-14 05:25:39.000000000 -0700
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ else
ac_checking_flags=release
fi])
IFS="${IFS= }"; ac_save_IFS="$IFS"; IFS="$IFS,"
-for check in release,$ac_checking_flags
+for check in $ac_checking_flags
do
case $check in
# these set all the flags to specific states