This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Cleanup code generation in lambda-code

From: "Daniel Berlin" <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: "Sebastian Pop" <sebpop at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Sjodin, Jan" <Jan dot Sjodin at amd dot com>, "Zdenek Dvorak" <rakdver at kam dot mff dot cuni dot cz>, "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, "GCC Patches" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Michael Matz" <matz at suse dot de>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 08:43:32 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch] Cleanup code generation in lambda-code
References: <84fc9c000706070334j1f4a65f3nd4fe58724f1d5c29@mail.gmail.com> <20070607133556.GA8770@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <4aca3dc20706070709x581acb5ep95e8c108e41aafcc@mail.gmail.com> <7986CEFCE5C2954A88BEE2CAB6FAB374026FF56B@SAUSEXMB2.amd.com> <cb9d34b20706070833g9d06ad4m3a35e697f7a60b4c@mail.gmail.com>

On 6/7/07, Sebastian Pop <sebpop@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

In the loop linear code gen pass we have a very specific case of dead
code elimination that we can address without running a more expensive
generic DCE.  This is why I thought it would make sense to have a
function to remove the unused ivs.

Sebastian

Okay, just making sure we weren't doing this for no good reason.
The patch looked fine.

References:
- Re: [patch] Cleanup code generation in lambda-code
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [patch] Cleanup code generation in lambda-code
  - From: Zdenek Dvorak
- Re: [patch] Cleanup code generation in lambda-code
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- RE: [patch] Cleanup code generation in lambda-code
  - From: Sjodin, Jan
- Re: [patch] Cleanup code generation in lambda-code
  - From: Sebastian Pop

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]