This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH COMMITTED: Don't break tests for enum in range


Laurent GUERBY <laurent@guerby.net> writes:

> I'm not sure this is your patch, but my latest Ada run on x86_64-linux
> had three new failures that might be VRP related:
> 
> c37213k.adb: In function 'C37213K':
> c37213k.adb:324: error: insn 75 outside of basic blocks has non-NULL bb field
> +===========================GNAT BUG DETECTED==============================+
> | 4.3.0 20070606 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) GCC error:      |
> | verify_flow_info failed                                                  |
> | Error detected around c37213k.adb:324                                    |
> 
> c61010a.adb: In function 'C61010A':
> c61010a.adb:246: error: insn 25 outside of basic blocks has non-NULL bb field
> +===========================GNAT BUG DETECTED==============================+
> | 4.3.0 20070606 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) GCC error:      |
> | verify_flow_info failed                                                  |
> | Error detected around c61010a.adb:246                                    |
> 

The above could not have anything to do with my patch.


> ,.,. CD92001 ACATS 2.5 07-06-06 23:17:29
> ---- CD92001 Check object attribute: X'Valid.
>    * CD92001 Expected 'Valid =FALSE for Default item  1.
>    * CD92001 Expected 'Valid =FALSE for Default item  2.

I will check this.  I ran the ada testsuite on 4.2 branch, but I did
not run it on mainline.  I will do that now.

(As I read my patch, it should not introduce a failure of this sort,
since all it does is avoid a simplification.  But I'll try it out.)

Ian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]