This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Libjava is broken again

From: Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
Cc: Matthias Klose <doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>, "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 11:53:15 +0200
Subject: Re: PATCH: Libjava is broken again
References: <20070604030226.GA26134@lucon.org> <20070604034531.GA18886@lucon.org> <4663C799.3040002@gnu.org> <18019.52652.2438.180430@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <4663D01E.5020005@gnu.org> <18019.54147.787752.670867@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <1180948229.10225.10.camel@dijkstra.wildebeest.org>

Mark Wielaard wrote:

On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 10:55 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
Paolo Bonzini writes:
(What is kjc by the way?...)
To be honest, I don't know. Taken unmodified from classpath.

Mark, I wonder if the proposed patch would actually belong in classpath. That is, is there a reason why Classpath dislikes GCJ, Jikes and KJC?

Paolo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Libjava is broken again
  - From: Mark Wielaard

References:
- PATCH: Libjava is broken again
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Libjava is broken again
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: PATCH: Libjava is broken again
  - From: Matthias Klose
- Re: PATCH: Libjava is broken again
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: PATCH: Libjava is broken again
  - From: Matthias Klose
- Re: PATCH: Libjava is broken again
  - From: Mark Wielaard

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]