This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] rvalue reference implementation for C++0x


On 5/25/07, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
write_type: We still need to establish a standard mangling for this.
I've poked the abi list again.

<type> ::= S <type> # rvalue reference-to


?

That reminds me that we need to establish a standard mangling for
variadic templates, too. I'll take a whack at that.

tsubst: We generally don't control DR resolution behavior changes with
flag_cpp0x; my impression has been that the flag is intended for
controlling new features.

It's intended to process C++0x rather than C++98/03. The DR in question (DR 106) came after TC1, and is in the C++0x Working Paper... so it should only apply in C++0x mode. The DR is here... it's marked "WP", not "TC1":

http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#106

- Doug


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]