This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [ARM] Don't shorten long calls to different sections

From: Richard Sandiford <richard at codesourcery dot com>
To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 12:40:09 +0100
Subject: Re: [ARM] Don't shorten long calls to different sections
References: <87veei0y12.fsf@firetop.home> <1180081451.3046.15.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <87wsyxz3rt.fsf@firetop.home> <1180089134.3046.19.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com>

Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> writes:
> On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 09:49 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Do you want the retain the behaviour that all calls to weak functions
>> are assumed long?  Or is it OK to treat them simply as calls to
>> externally-defined functions, as the patch does?  (I realise you
>> said OK, just thought I'd better clarify.)
>
> I consider the existing behaviour a bug.  So no need to change your
> code.

OK, thanks (and thanks for the review).  Patch installed.

Richard

References:
- [ARM] Don't shorten long calls to different sections
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: [ARM] Don't shorten long calls to different sections
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: [ARM] Don't shorten long calls to different sections
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: [ARM] Don't shorten long calls to different sections
  - From: Richard Earnshaw

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]