This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH]: PR middle-end/30250, use MPFR for lgamma_r/gamma_r


On 5/24/07, Kaveh R. GHAZI <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2007, Richard Guenther wrote:

> This:
>
> /* Expect failures at least until mpfr-2.3.0 is released. */
> /* { dg-xfail-if "mpfr-2.3.0" { *-*-* } } */
>
> doesn't work.  Or did you forget a testsuite/lib patch?
> Richard.

There was no testsuite patch involved, dg-xfail-if should work just fine.
Can you provide some more info as to what exactly doesn't work?  Here are
some 4.3.0 testresults posted for the trunk dated 20070523 on various
platforms.  None of them show builtin-math-4.c failing:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-05/msg01156.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-05/msg01155.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-05/msg01153.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-05/msg01151.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-05/msg01143.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-05/msg01132.html

Ah!  I found one from Joe Buck that doesn't pickup the xfail:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-05/msg01149.html

But I can't explain why. Maybe he's using an outdated version of dejagnu?

Hm, I don't know how this dg-xfail-if is supposed to work - where does it get the mpfr-2.3.0 thing from? I'm using the (outdated, but the docs only list 1.4.4 as requirement) dejagnu 1.4.3 and mpfr 2.2.0.

Richard.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]