--- Begin Message ---
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- To: Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck at naturalbridge dot com>
- Cc: bonzini at gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 23 May 2007 06:47:55 -0700
- Subject: Re: another pending patch
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns;h=received:to:cc:subject:references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:lines:user-agent:mime-version:content-type;b=s7SxQUfc3FWTk9HMjGsCOHuZNcLSjXW5GaF1TTixRho05CSyPFOz3qHRuHp4BGAl/f2GTRMpivm+EblPbXrRKQ==
- References: <4653EE58.9020801@lu.unisi.ch><46542EA7.7050609@naturalbridge.com>
Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck@naturalbridge.com> writes:
> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Actually, there's also
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-02/msg01798.html
> >
> > on which I would like more input from the experts.
> >
> > Paolo
Paolo, that patch is OK for mainline.
An appropriate followup would be something like __builtin_blockage(),
although I hope we can find a better name. This would be similar to
__sync_synchronize(), though different in that it would not clobber
memory.
Thanks.
Ian
--- End Message ---