This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen <rask at sygehus dot dk>
Cc: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 07:47:17 -0400
Subject: Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
References: <200705102046.l4AKkiB4017813@greed.delorie.com> <20070510212451.GA2251@caradoc.them.org> <200705102127.l4ALRckj018854@greed.delorie.com> <20070510213806.GA3095@caradoc.them.org> <200705110107.l4B17HBb022768@greed.delorie.com> <20070511072200.GF5690@sygehus.dk>

On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:22:00AM +0200, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
>    I'm pretty sure some targets have the ability to place small objects
> directly in the GOT. Google turned up empty, though. Do you know that it is
> a pointer rather than e.g. a 64-bit integer?

It's a TLS offset.  If it's not pointer-sized, that probably means I
goofed when implementing MIPS TLS.

DJ, does this go in 32-bit ELF or 64-bit ELF?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
  - From: DJ Delorie

References:
- mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: mips tls with -mlong64/-mgp32
  - From: Rask Ingemann Lambertsen

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]