This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: PATCH RFC: Ensure TREE_TYPE (TYPE_MIN_VALUE (t)) == t
"Andrew Pinski" <pinskia@gmail.com> writes:
> On 27 Apr 2007 13:49:54 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
> > "Richard Guenther" <richard.guenther@gmail.com> writes:
> > Thanks for the feedback. Patch committed to mainline and 4.2 branch.
>
> I think this is going to break Ada, can you double check what Kenner
> mentioned is correct?
My patch can not break Ada any more than it is already broken.
However, I will certainly test Ada to see if anything changes.
> And I still say the overflow patch in VRP should not (I repeat should
> not) have been committed this late, if you look at all the fall out,
> 4.2 is going to be worse now than ever before.
I assume that by fall out you mean the bug reports which I have fixed?
We have had this fight, and it has been decided. I never argued that
the overflow patch was an unalloyed good; it was merely, in my
opinion, the best of a set of poor choices. Please stop trying to
reopen the fight. That serves no useful purpose. At the very least,
please say which alternative negative consequence you would have
preferred.
Ian