This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: non-local goto optimization

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:11:40 +0100
Subject: Re: non-local goto optimization
References: <462C6A54.7080502@codesourcery.com> <200704241835.07308.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr> <462F1587.7030700@codesourcery.com> <200704252328.55043.ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>

Eric Botcazou wrote:

So it seems that we really need a new flag in struct function after all. But I would rather name it "calls_unwind_init" like a few others and invoke the new has_nonexceptional_receiver predicate directly from reload.

ok, I'll rework this and move those fields RichardG mentioned should be aligned.

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::         CodeSourcery
nathan@codesourcery.com    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk

Follow-Ups:
- Re: non-local goto optimization
  - From: Eric Botcazou

References:
- non-local goto optimization
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: non-local goto optimization
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: non-local goto optimization
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: non-local goto optimization
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]